Show more

@graydon @cstross @rbos Two mechanical failures, in fact,
if I recall. I think spacey.space/@TheSpaceAboveUs should have got there by now; I’ll have to pick it back up.

@Wolven Yeah. Sometimes I dare to hope that improving this situation, as unimportant as it seems to the big picture, might provide some inspiration for progress on more pressing issues.

@Wolven Are you connecting that to what I said with “… and I would rather the conversation about them focus on that and not irrelevant things” or with “… so I think any attack on them is legitimate, even if it might promote misunderstanding” or with some other thing I’m missing?

@robinsonmeyer Exxxactly. This is the system working as designed at the moment.

Public ownership of gray, stable, safety-of-life infrastructure that should not be run at a profit is clearly necessary. It does not follow that everything publicly owned should be boring and reliable.

Show thread

I think a lot of people who favor public ownership of publicly important things get tricked this way, into thinking that we should have the status quo but with different structures on paper.

Imagine a NASA that wasn’t being dogwalked by Congress, that got to apply most of its budget to weird-but-might-work stuff like New Horizons and the helicopter on Mars. Imagine a NASA with a 35% failure rate but a 65% “holy fuck, whoa” rate for uncrewed space missions.

Show thread

Also I think it's fine to hate them just because Musk is in charge! You don't have to justify it by trying to have an opinion about the most effective way to build an absurdly large rocket.

Show thread

Yes. SpaceX has done bad things and deserves to be criticized for them. But (and I think this is analogous to a lot of issues) the problem here isn’t that SpaceX isn’t NASA; it’s that NASA doesn’t have the political room to experiment and inevitably sometimes fail that SpaceX does. This is too complex an issue to fit all the layers and nuance into one honk, but “SpaceX is bad because their rockets explode” is not a good analysis. chaos.social/@russss/110249195

The cat loves to be skritched but hates to be touched, and so far the best solution is for me to “lick” her face with a paintbrush, but she has to sniff it suspiciously before each session, make it take its shoes off, remove all electronics from its bags, etc.

"Oddly enough the overriding sensation I got looking at the Earth was, My God that little thing is so fragile out there."

— Michael Collins, Apollo 11 astronaut

#EarthDay
#NASAhistory

Sometimes I feel like I’m still a kid pretending to be a grownup, but other times I catch myself thinking, as I just did, “The squares on this roll of paper towels are so well sized that I’m going to use fewer so the roll lasts longer.”

You see a lot of big black trucks with troubling bumper stickers on the highways, but null County does have a deeply rooted alternative arts scene and some gorgeous scenery. onewilshire.la/@CALandscapeBot

We only have a couple grammatical markers for “this is a person and not a thing” but as long as we do I’m going to respect the hell out of them.

Show thread

I understand how using “that” instead of “who” in contexts like “people that were there” is normal and has a long history and language changes and I’m the weird one, but wow does it rub me the wrong way.

Just published this analysis on the websites that power AI chatbots. We looked specifically at C4, used by Google, Facebook and others.

Some of my favorite findings:
- RT.com (Russian propaganda) is 65th ranked site in here
- Two of the top 100 sites are voter registration databases w names, addresses, party (why?)
- More that 500,000 personal blogs, including mine
- "©" appears > 200 million times

More interesting nuggets in here: https://wapo.st/3AcdDUm

Imagining an animist looking at this with the same eyes that mainstream Christian theologians used for Hóng Xiùquán saying he was Christ’s little brother. chatpdf.com/

Show more
Horsin' Around

This is a hometown instance run by Sam and Ingrid, for some friends.