Show more

@kissane Not disagreeing, but (but) I think a factor in this is the sense that if a dev walks away the code is still there,¹ whereas moderation is “on call” work,² and this is in fact weird considering how we (we) usually value artifact work v. care work.

1. Just to be very clear, I think this is correct only at the most surface level and overlooks how much of good development is continuing community management.

2. JTBVC, I think this is also wrong-ish, but now I’m at my character limit.

I relish the opportunities that software offers to remember that not everyone has the same perspective on whether, for example, things identified by their times should be sortable according to their times. What a gift this is; I honor and celebrate and wallow in this wonderful moment.

@beep All I’m going to say is that if I tried to put something in the sky that literally burned your eyes to look at, and gave you a rash, and oh yeah also caused skin cancer, I would be rightly called to account. And yet when nature does it,

Plant ID, anyone? I picked up a handful of these from a free box in someone’s yard on my morning walk. The label just said “free succulents”.

@secretasianman Yeah, it must be one of the largest viewsheds in the area. Actually, what I’ve always wanted to visit is just north of there: Mt Maxwell. We had a distant view aligned with its cliff face, which looked very cool on the horizon. Like a bunch of rolling islands and then this one sharp(ish) ⌳ shape.

@secretasianman I used to listen to the CBC Radio 2 broadcast from Sooke/Metchosin and idly wonder how it was spelled. Have still never been.

@powerllama My previous repost (you’d think I’d work out how to thread things properly, but you’d be wrong): assemblag.es/@jcalpickard/1125

I do not 100% agree with everything Alison Gopnik ever says but the way I was grumpily muttering, a year ago, that people were critiquing LLMs wrong, and should be thinking more about children, and cultural transmission, and feedback loops, and then Gopnik popped up and did all of that far more clearly than I was even imagining, and with way more intellectual grounding – it’s been very satisfying, thank you.

Gopnikists assemble!

'Alison, you’ve argued that the currently popular AI systems, LLMs, are neither intelligent nor dumb—that those are the wrong categories by which to understand them. Rather, we should think of them as cultural technologies, like the printing press or the internet. Why is a “cultural technology” a better framework for understanding LLMs?'

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/how-to-raise-your-artificial-intelligence-a-conversation-with-alison-gopnik-and-melanie-mitchell/

@aredridel Yeah, it seems like a very wise balance. Here’s some discussion of the paper I was thinking of (link at the very end): gantry.io/blog/monolith-the-re

@aredridel I think that’s right. They put out a paper about it a few years ago but I assume it’s obsolete now if it was ever the whole truth.

@aredridel It’s kind of interesting that it took this long for someone to try making an algorithmic feed that mostly shows you stuff you like instead of stuff that makes Engagement Georg comment 431 times.

imagine what a creature called the "mountain chicken" might look like.

then google it.

Show more
Horsin' Around

This is a hometown instance run by Sam and Ingrid, for some friends.