[trying to explain the internet to 10-year-old me] it’s like America’s Funniest Home Videos times that weird conference Dad took us to where the guy showed slides of a structure matching the dimensions of Noah’s Ark that he found in a glacier in Turkey but he couldn’t say it was Noah’s Ark because there were Soviet agents in the room
when the international package arrives, don't you bow before its worldliness? don't you ask it: how was chiba? how was hong kong? how was dubai? when you met de gaulle, did he resemble a statesman or a complex arrangement of conveyor belts? and were you bothered at all by potholes or the driver's evasive swerves?
#JUNO #Jupiter orbiter
#JIRAM Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper
Perijove 53 #IO
https://atmos.nmsu.edu/PDS/data/PDS4/juno_jiram_bundle/data_raw/orbit53/
NASA/JPL/SwRI/JIRAM/ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ASTROFISICA/j. Roger
Giant malign forces of capital 20 years ago use a weird interpretation of copyright as a tool to hurt normal people.
Giant malign forces of capital today use a more or less opposite weird interpretation of copyright as a tool to hurt normal people.
Reasonably well-informed commentators with mostly good takes: Ah, clearly the problem is that we don’t have a perfect interpretation of copyright. Consider the following thought experiment – an artist in a state of nature approaches a cave wall and…
I’ve said this before and I fear I’ll have to say it again, but watching the flip of politically connected, ridiculously wealthy, more or less unregulatable companies v. well-meaning knowledge workers on the issue of “copyright is absolute and inviolable” v. “copyright is just an idea, man” has been real unpleasant!
Running $(find ../../.. -type f -mmin -5) to learn where this code put its outputs because it’s easier than figuring it out.
@kissane Not disagreeing, but (but) I think a factor in this is the sense that if a dev walks away the code is still there,¹ whereas moderation is “on call” work,² and this is in fact weird considering how we (we) usually value artifact work v. care work.
1. Just to be very clear, I think this is correct only at the most surface level and overlooks how much of good development is continuing community management.
2. JTBVC, I think this is also wrong-ish, but now I’m at my character limit.
@beep All I’m going to say is that if I tried to put something in the sky that literally burned your eyes to look at, and gave you a rash, and oh yeah also caused skin cancer, I would be rightly called to account. And yet when nature does it,
@nein09 Ah, this is useful even if uncertain. Thank you!
@secretasianman Yeah, it must be one of the largest viewsheds in the area. Actually, what I’ve always wanted to visit is just north of there: Mt Maxwell. We had a distant view aligned with its cliff face, which looked very cool on the horizon. Like a bunch of rolling islands and then this one sharp(ish) ⌳ shape.
Cameron, Mendocino County, CA
🗺39.2718, -123.5535 🧭232° ⛰1512 ft
https://ops.alertcalifornia.org/cam-console/1874
@secretasianman No, my mistake – I was usually listening to https://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=CBU-FM-1&service=FM&s=F; they just mentioned the Sooke/Metchosin frequency.
@secretasianman I used to listen to the CBC Radio 2 broadcast from Sooke/Metchosin and idly wonder how it was spelled. Have still never been.
@powerllama My previous repost (you’d think I’d work out how to thread things properly, but you’d be wrong): https://assemblag.es/@jcalpickard/112535967070633529
You know him on the internet. Eucalypt-adjacent; very occasional writer. Consulting and passively looking for work in geospatial, image processing, and related fields.