I think a lot of people who favor public ownership of publicly important things get tricked this way, into thinking that we should have the status quo but with different structures on paper.
Imagine a NASA that wasn’t being dogwalked by Congress, that got to apply most of its budget to weird-but-might-work stuff like New Horizons and the helicopter on Mars. Imagine a NASA with a 35% failure rate but a 65% “holy fuck, whoa” rate for uncrewed space missions.
Also I think it's fine to hate them just because Musk is in charge! You don't have to justify it by trying to have an opinion about the most effective way to build an absurdly large rocket.
Yes. SpaceX has done bad things and deserves to be criticized for them. But (and I think this is analogous to a lot of issues) the problem here isn’t that SpaceX isn’t NASA; it’s that NASA doesn’t have the political room to experiment and inevitably sometimes fail that SpaceX does. This is too complex an issue to fit all the layers and nuance into one honk, but “SpaceX is bad because their rockets explode” is not a good analysis. https://chaos.social/@russss/110249195107310284
"Oddly enough the overriding sensation I got looking at the Earth was, My God that little thing is so fragile out there."
— Michael Collins, Apollo 11 astronaut
You see a lot of big black trucks with troubling bumper stickers on the highways, but null County does have a deeply rooted alternative arts scene and some gorgeous scenery. https://onewilshire.la/@CALandscapeBot/110228020545711615
We only have a couple grammatical markers for “this is a person and not a thing” but as long as we do I’m going to respect the hell out of them.
Just published this analysis on the websites that power AI chatbots. We looked specifically at C4, used by Google, Facebook and others.
Some of my favorite findings:
- RT.com (Russian propaganda) is 65th ranked site in here
- Two of the top 100 sites are voter registration databases w names, addresses, party (why?)
- More that 500,000 personal blogs, including mine
- "©" appears > 200 million times
More interesting nuggets in here: https://wapo.st/3AcdDUm
Willis Peak 2, Ventura County, CA
🗺34.3025, -119.2307 🧭0° ⛰1184 ft
https://alertca.live/cam-console/2512
Imagining an animist looking at this with the same eyes that mainstream Christian theologians used for Hóng Xiùquán saying he was Christ’s little brother. https://www.chatpdf.com/
Like, “Keeping orcas in captivity is unethical because they’re basically just hairy sharks” is not a good argument.
Actually, I’ll walk that half a step back. I think “just word prediction machines” has some value for introducing people to the idea of an LLM from scratch. But it’s a bit of a “whales are like fish that breastfeed” thing – an orienting statement that is true-ish but really not a good place to stop.
1. Without committing to any firm position, this is why “they’re just word prediction machines” is such a weak criticism of LLMs. There are things you can say about them that are both meaner and less reductive, so why turn to that one? But hey, I’m just a next-action machine, I guess.
2. More essays like this, I say. There are a lot of things I disagree with in it, but I never felt that my attention or the complexity of the issue was disrespected.
If technology continues to progress at current rates – and, more importantly, current rates of acceleration – we may soon live in a world where web forms don’t show giant red warnings like DANGER! YOU SCREWED UP VERY BADLY! THIS IS FALSE! IT IS A FEDERAL CRIME TO LIE IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES! when you start typing your phone number because it doesn’t have enough digits to be a phone number yet.
You know him on the internet. Eucalypt-adjacent; very occasional writer. Consulting and passively looking for work in geospatial, image processing, and related fields.