Show more

@doriantaylor No worries. I’m just saying it’s interesting how much people in ordinary speech bring up binary as a ·layer· of abstraction – not a choice or method, where isomorphism matters, but a level. Not binary as opposed to trinary, but binary as somehow more diagnostic or distinctive than all the other things in the stack that make computers like that.

@doriantaylor I feel like we’re having two different conversations here. But I agree with the one you’re having, and that’s good enough for me.

@doriantaylor I would go further and say it was a pretty good insight. But it doesn’t really address what I said, does it?

@doriantaylor I still think it’s weird how much people like privileging binary as an especially important layer of abstraction. “It’s all ones and zeros” is no more true than like a dozen other things you could say about even computers in the commonly understood contemporary style.

I’m like 90% sure Sir Thomas Browne makes this point somewhere in “Hydriotaphia”.

Show thread

Kind of humbling to hold something in your hand, even just a chunk of cheap tea, that might last longer into the future than the Marvel movie timeline itself.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-number-system-invented-by-inuit-schoolchildren-will-make-its-silicon-valley-debut/

A) this is delightful.
B) Scientific American should be ashamed of the sloppy synecdoche of "Silicon Valley":
- UC Berkeley isn't in Silicon Valley.
- UC Berkeley isn't exactly a part of the semiconductor-software-venture-capital industry, even if it's got lots of ties.
- The Unicode Consortium _is_ based in Silicon Valley, but it's a nonprofit, and not usually what we mean by the synecdoche of Silicon Valley.
- You have to read quite far into the article to find out who else is involved, and even then it's tangential mention of Google and the Consortium.

This article would have been so much more powerful if it had talked about the relationships involved and not made it breathless "Tech Industry Supports Indigenous Peoples" reporting.

@midendian @numist Is there a (struggling for terminology here) characteristic timescale to the shimmer that defines the optimal fps for defeating it? Like presumably in even a lossless video, most frames would be practically wasted.

@meetar This whole time I was assuming you meant Windows the operating system.

Having a bad time reading LLM critiques as I gradually realize they're not gonna critique the idea of human general intelligence

@randometc I suspect that the (still partial) transition to HLLs, RISC, and interpreted languages is a valuable comparison here. That also involved programmers giving up valuable kinds of control for other valuable things. (Disclaimer: have not used any commercial LLM.)

Show more
Horsin' Around

This is a hometown instance run by Sam and Ingrid, for some friends.