Show more

Sometimes I feel like I’m still a kid pretending to be a grownup, but other times I catch myself thinking, as I just did, “The squares on this roll of paper towels are so well sized that I’m going to use fewer so the roll lasts longer.”

You see a lot of big black trucks with troubling bumper stickers on the highways, but null County does have a deeply rooted alternative arts scene and some gorgeous scenery. onewilshire.la/@CALandscapeBot

We only have a couple grammatical markers for “this is a person and not a thing” but as long as we do I’m going to respect the hell out of them.

Show thread

I understand how using “that” instead of “who” in contexts like “people that were there” is normal and has a long history and language changes and I’m the weird one, but wow does it rub me the wrong way.

Just published this analysis on the websites that power AI chatbots. We looked specifically at C4, used by Google, Facebook and others.

Some of my favorite findings:
- RT.com (Russian propaganda) is 65th ranked site in here
- Two of the top 100 sites are voter registration databases w names, addresses, party (why?)
- More that 500,000 personal blogs, including mine
- "©" appears > 200 million times

More interesting nuggets in here: https://wapo.st/3AcdDUm

Imagining an animist looking at this with the same eyes that mainstream Christian theologians used for Hóng Xiùquán saying he was Christ’s little brother. chatpdf.com/

Like, “Keeping orcas in captivity is unethical because they’re basically just hairy sharks” is not a good argument.

Show thread

Actually, I’ll walk that half a step back. I think “just word prediction machines” has some value for introducing people to the idea of an LLM from scratch. But it’s a bit of a “whales are like fish that breastfeed” thing – an orienting statement that is true-ish but really not a good place to stop.

Show thread

1. Without committing to any firm position, this is why “they’re just word prediction machines” is such a weak criticism of LLMs. There are things you can say about them that are both meaner and less reductive, so why turn to that one? But hey, I’m just a next-action machine, I guess.

2. More essays like this, I say. There are a lot of things I disagree with in it, but I never felt that my attention or the complexity of the issue was disrespected.

hachyderm.io/@jyasskin/1102149

If technology continues to progress at current rates – and, more importantly, current rates of acceleration – we may soon live in a world where web forms don’t show giant red warnings like DANGER! YOU SCREWED UP VERY BADLY! THIS IS FALSE! IT IS A FEDERAL CRIME TO LIE IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES! when you start typing your phone number because it doesn’t have enough digits to be a phone number yet.

I’m like 90% sure Sir Thomas Browne makes this point somewhere in “Hydriotaphia”.

Show thread

Kind of humbling to hold something in your hand, even just a chunk of cheap tea, that might last longer into the future than the Marvel movie timeline itself.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-number-system-invented-by-inuit-schoolchildren-will-make-its-silicon-valley-debut/

A) this is delightful.
B) Scientific American should be ashamed of the sloppy synecdoche of "Silicon Valley":
- UC Berkeley isn't in Silicon Valley.
- UC Berkeley isn't exactly a part of the semiconductor-software-venture-capital industry, even if it's got lots of ties.
- The Unicode Consortium _is_ based in Silicon Valley, but it's a nonprofit, and not usually what we mean by the synecdoche of Silicon Valley.
- You have to read quite far into the article to find out who else is involved, and even then it's tangential mention of Google and the Consortium.

This article would have been so much more powerful if it had talked about the relationships involved and not made it breathless "Tech Industry Supports Indigenous Peoples" reporting.

Show more
Horsin' Around

This is a hometown instance run by Sam and Ingrid, for some friends.