WebP has flaws as a format – don’t we all – but I think the commentary should be putting more blame on (1) the industry’s failure to standardize on (and rigorously reviews the implementations of) a single JPEG successor format, given the obvious hunger, and (2) the practice of implementing anything that reads nontrivial untrusted data in a programming language that is not memory-safe.
Une chronophotographie du 59e vol de l'hélicoptère martien #Ingenuity 🚁 qui permet de bien se rendre compte des différents paliers atteints : 5 en montée, 3 en descente, avec une altitude max (et record) de 20 m.
Crédit : NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU/DejaSu #Mars #MarsHelicopter
You ever think about how we have the both-sides view of a lot of important personal correspondences, even state-of-the-art-ly–encrypted correspondences, from like the early modern era and such? Or like we have Pepys’s diary, which (if I recall) he assumed that only he could read? It comes to mind a lot when I write a personal e-mail or make a new notes.md or whatever.
I’m against this. https://mastodon.social/@weatherwest/111098709498989880
Having worked around some very good programmers over the years (@sgillies, for example) means that sometimes when I write unwise code there’s a little voice saying “Wait, do it the better way! Save yourself the pain!” and I ignore it.
Okay, fine, @jonty cajoled me into it. Lighter is more traffic; warmer is more positive anomaly for the day.
Now, certain nerds and haters might squint at this and say “It looks like you did this in oklab color space and then tried to half-ass some gamut mapping when you remembered that a lot of the highest z scores are in places with very low traffic counts!” and I would rebut that in scrupulous detail with one simple argument: Good night.
Ideally you’d have this over a basemap and with both dimensions (number of views and view anomaly) visible, but I will generously allow someone else to worry about that.
Same general idea and source data, but this time it’s just z-score (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_score), with red positive and green negative. Hard to say that this makes it easier to spot the interesting anomalies, but it seemed like the common sense thing to try. You can see the the OceanGate incident, the earthquake in Turkey and Syria, probably some festivals, etc.
The answers to your questions are:
1. Yacht and rally car races.
2. Yes, well noticed! We call it “Null Island”.
3. No, but it would be nice if it were practical.
4. People scraping tiles.
5. Yes, because the distribution of traffic follows Zipf’s law.
6. If I have time.
The amount of high-quality open data in these releases is amazing, and it’s been consistently timely.
If I were doing disaster response work at the moment, I would be building heavily on this data.
Hard to think of another company giving out this much top-tier product, under CC-BY-NC and with no sign-up, just to help with disasters.
You know him on the internet. Eucalypt-adjacent; very occasional writer. Consulting and passively looking for work in geospatial, image processing, and related fields.